Tuesday, June 25, 2024

Can You Sue The Government For Emotional Distress

Don't Miss

Can You Sue The Government For Pain And Suffering

False Claims Act Whistleblower Rewards and Protections from Retaliation

Pain and suffering damages are intended to compensate a victim for the suffering they have had to endure. They are a part of most injury cases. You absolutely can sue the federal government, whether that be a federal administrative agency or employee, for pain and suffering and to try and claim compensation for your experience. These damages are categorized with other damages such as property damage, medical expenses, and more.

Filing a claim for pain and suffering is never easy. This is because they are damages that cant be quantified. There are no receipts or reports that state exactly how much you are owed. The amount of money that your pain and suffering claim is worth will be calculated by examining all of the evidence for your emotional distress.

You must seek the help of an attorney at The Law Place if you wish to claim against the government. A claim of this nature is incredibly complex, and you will need our professional and experienced legal team to help guide you through the process.

our personal injury lawyers today

Suing For Alienation Of Affection

The core element of the alienation of affection claim is that the defendant is the cause of the separation or divorce. In this case, the adulterous affair need not be the single reason why the marriage ended. The claim will hold its weight in court if it was proven that the defendant was a controlling cause for the alienation. These claims apply not only to a third-party partner but also can be brought against counselors, therapists, family members, or anyone responsible for the break-up. To sue for alienation of affection you must prove the following:

  • The plaintiff and the spouse had a loving, affectionate marriage
  • The love and affection were destroyed and the plaintiff and the spouse were alienated
  • The defendants malicious action directly caused the alienation
  • The alienation caused the plaintiff to be emotionally distressed or damaged in some way

How Do I Win A Claim For Emotional Distress

If an accident emotionally damages you, you may deserve financial compensation. Emotional distress is one category of damages that you can claim.

To win a claim for emotional distress, you must include the demand for compensation in your legal filings. You must prepare the evidence to show that youve suffered emotional distress. You must prove the severity of your injuries.

Have you been hurt in an accident? The attorneys at Adam S. Kutner Accident & Injury Attorneys can help. Our experienced Las Vegas personal injury law firm can ensure that you win compensation for all of the types of damages that occur, including emotional distress. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation.

You May Like: City Jobs In Las Vegas

How Can A Lawyer Help

Filing a claim against the federal government for negligence is far more complicated than most negligence claims against individuals. You must hire an attorney to help you out with your case to ensure that you comply with the many notice of claim requirements and unique aspects that apply to cases filed against the federal government.

An attorney at our firm will be able to offer you some honest and unbiased legal advice. They will be able to make you aware of all of your legal rights and ensure that you have all the information you need about all the different laws.

We have helped countless clients with their injury cases. If you have been injured because of the fault of a federal administrative body or employee, we can help you.

Who Can File An Emotional Distress Claim

Little One Magazine: Emotional Distress Lawsuit Against Employer

In Wisconsin, in order to file a legal claim for negligent emotional distress the law requires three conditions:

  • The victim was severely injured or killed in the accident
  • The claimant is a close relative of the victim
  • The claimant witnessed the accident or its immediate aftermath
  • The statute of limitations for emotional distress claims is three years from the date of the accident, just like personal injury claims.

    The thought of suing for emotional distress while still coping with your losses can seem overwhelming, but it really is in your best interest not to delay. The longer you wait, the more evidence slips away and the harder it can be to build a strong case.

    Insurance companies are well aware of the three-year time limit and have been known to use delay tactics to try and run out the clock.

    Asking for help is the first – and hardest – step. You owe it to yourself to take action.

    We take winning personally

    How do you prove emotional distress?

    Proving emotional distress to an insurance adjuster or in court can be difficult, especially without qualified legal representation. Successful claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress must prove:

    • The person at fault for the accident behaved negligently
    • Their negligence caused the accident and the victims injuries
    • The claimant suffered emotional distress

    Things you can do to prove emotional distress damages include:

    How much can you claim for emotional distress?

    You May Like: What Is Congress Mortgage Stimulus Program For The Middle Class

    Can You Sue A School District If They Don’t Stop Bullying

    According to the website stopbullying.gov, most state laws, policies, and regulations require districts and schools to have a bullying policy. Furthermore, they’re required to have procedures to follow during investigation and responses for bullying. School districts might be liable if something an administrator or teacher said was the source of how the bullying began. When authority figures show other students it’s okay to pick on a student by degrading or harassing them in public, they could be held liable for starting the bullying.

    The effects of bullying have become more commonly known in recent years. Bullying can cause children to become depressed, have anxiety, and can even lead to suicide or other forms of violence. You may wonder, can you sue a school district for emotional distress from bullying. The answer is yes. When teachers or administrators witness bullying and do nothing about it, it could be viewed as condoning it, which gives the bully even more power to oppress. Children should be treated equally while at school, and that means protected equally.

    What Types Of Incidents Can Cause Emotional Distress

    A claim for emotional distress can arise from any traumatic event. Examples of situations that could lead to emotional distress include:

    Even though emotional distress is recognized as recoverable damage after an injury or accident, establishing a value for emotional distress can be challenging.

    Recommended Reading: Favr Car Allowance Calculator

    Can Punishment At School Be Considered Abuse

    Most states have outlawed the use of corporal punishment, which is punishment meant to cause a student physical pain. However, many states allow physical intervention under some circumstances, like breaking up a fight or preventing property damage. Still, suppose a school employee uses excessive force and causes severe injuries to your child. In that case, you may be able to be compensated through a civil lawsuit.

    What Kind Of Lawsuit Includes Mental Anguish


    Mental anguish is an element of claims of both intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Mental anguish is part of the damage alleged by a person who is the victim of the infliction of emotional distress, whether negligent or intentional.

    Mental anguish could also be an element of the damage alleged in other claims, such as battery, assault, an auto accident or medical malpractice. For example, if a person threatens another with serious bodily harm by pointing a gun at them, which is an assault, the trauma will likely cause injury that is more psychological than physical.

    Mental anguish can also accompany significant physical injury. For example, a person can experience severe anxiety and depression after a serious medical error injures them physically, possibly affecting the quality of their life permanently.

    One person can also suffer mental anguish from injury to another person, for example, losing a family member in a car crash that results in a wrongful death suit. Emotional distress is often the result when a person witnesses the harming or injuring of a loved one.

    Recommended Reading: Rtc Transit Jobs

    What Customers Are Saying:

    Your Expert confirmed everything that I had been told, and didn’t want to believe. Thank you for putting my mind at rest.


    This has been very helpful. I’m glad to see that lawyers and sites like this exist. Thanks for your help.

    MikeHalifax, NS

    Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises!

    Gary B.Edmond, OK

    My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer.

    EricRedwood City, CA

    I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight.

    MichaelWichita, KS

    First Amendment Limits On Iied Liability

    Certain intentional actions which may meet the prima facie case for an IIED may not qualify for tort liability as an IIED, depending on the person at whom the conduct is directed or who commits the action.

    Typically, a court will not assign IIED tort liability to a defendant who speaks harmfully about public figures.

    Further, as per Texas v. Johnson , overnment may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.

    You May Like: Federal Government Jobs San Antonio Tx

    The Government May Be Immune From Your Injury Claims

    The government is immune from certaininjury claims. While this immunity is less broad than in the past, thegovernment is still immune from many injury claims. Again, this immunity varies from state to state. Let’s take alook at the government immunity laws of two states.

    In Illinois, there are several governmental immunities related to negligenceclaims. Under Illinois Law, the government is immune from lawsuit fornegligence for:

    • failure tosupervise activity on public property
    • negligencerelated to health and safety inspections, and
    • negligenceconnected to injuries caused by unsafe conditions on government propertyif the government did not have notice of the conditions.

    In Pennsylvania, governmental employees and entities also enjoy certainimmunities from liability. These immunities relate to:

    • operationof a motor vehicle
    • care,custody, and control of personal and real property in possession of thegovernment
    • dangerousconditions of trees, traffic controls, street lighting, utility servicefacilities streets, and sidewalks, and
    • care,custody, or control of animals in possession of the government.

    Most states will not allow injured persons to recover punitive damages fromthe government. Punitive damages are compensation that is awarded to an injuredperson in order to punish the wrongdoer and deter future similar misconduct.The rationale behind this policy isthat, where the government is involved, punitive damages would not have thesame deterrent effect.

    Suing For Emotional Distress

    Can I Sue for Emotional Distress or Pain and Suffering from a Car ...

    Following an act of negligence, its relatively common knowledge that you can sue someone for physical injuries. However, a common question related to those same circumstances is, Can I sue someone for emotional distress?

    Experiencing a serious accident can not only result in physical injuries but emotional suffering as well. Compared to physical injuries, emotional distress can be difficult to quantify. However, the damages and the impact on victims are still very real.

    Suing for emotional distress allows a victim to recover some of these damages. Read on as we explore the legal ramifications of suing for emotional distress.

    Recommended Reading: Sacramento Jobs Government

    How To Prove Mental Anguish

    In most civil cases, a plaintiff must prove the defendants negligence by a preponderance of the evidence. This means that the negligence was more likely than not. This is known as the standard of proof. This is not the same degree of proof beyond a reasonable doubt that applies in criminal cases. However, if the plaintiff cannot meet this burden, they may fail to recover damages. Proving the defendants negligence is the first step in a claim for damages for mental anguish.

    Evidence of the extreme nature of the defendants negligence or intentional misconduct makes success for a claim of emotional distress more likely. Also evidence of the intense and severe suffering of the plaintiff helps establish the injury.

    The following types of evidence contribute to establishing the severity of mental anguish:

    The severity of mental anguish is most effectively shown if it manifests as a diagnosable condition, such as depression, PTSD, or acute anxiety. It would be advantageous to have the testimony of a doctor to support a diagnosis.

    The person who suffers mental anguish should also keep a journal of their experience, recording such information as: the nature of the symptoms suffered, when symptoms started, how the person experienced the symptoms, what effect they had on the persons daily activities and what treatment was sought, if any.

    Should You Represent Yourself Or Get An Attorney

    The FTCA is a complex law. You will have the best chance to clear all of the procedural hurdles and overcome the arcane legal defenses of the federal government if you have an experienced lawyer on your side. And, as with any personal injury case, if your damages are substantial, you are likely to get a better result if you hire an attorney.

    If your case is simple and you aren’t asking for a lot of money, it might not make financial sense to hire an attorney. But remember that a lawyer can help you figure out how much your case is worth and your claim might be worth more than you think. Most personal injury lawyers don’t charge you for an initial consultation. Talk to a lawyer about the range of damages in your case and how personal injury lawyers get paid.

    If you decide to handle your own lawsuit, you might be able to get some assistance from the Pro Se Office at the courthouse where you file your claim, which helps plaintiffs who are not represented by an attorney.

    If you want to know more about special rules for personal injury claims against the government, read How to Win Your Personal Injury Claim, by Joseph L. Matthews . For help finding an experienced personal injury lawyer in your area check out Nolo’s Lawyer Directory.

    Recommended Reading: Grants For Dental Implants For Seniors

    Remedies For Breach Of Confidence

    13.15 In traditional claims for breach of confidence in Australia, plaintiffs have generally sought one of three remedies: an injunction to restrain an anticipated or continuing breach of confidence an account of the anticipated profits derived from a breach or compensation for economic loss due to a breach.

    13.16 An injunction to restrain publication or misuse is the most valuable and effective remedy in respect of all kinds of information: commercial, governmental or personal information. The remedies of an account of profits or equitable compensation are usual in cases involving commercial information. Beginning with Prince Albert suing to restrain the publication of a catalogue of Queen Victorias family etchings in 1849, breach of confidence actions in equity have long been used to protect personal information, but the cases invariably concerned applications for injunctions.

    Compensation for breach of confidence

    13.17 While the general entitlement to compensation for breach of confidence is now well-established, issues about assessment remain unresolved. In 1982, IE Davidson noted that, even in commercial cases, assessment of loss was difficult:

    13.18 In 1999, the New South Wales Court of Appeal was still describing equitable compensation as a developing area of the law. In 2014, the authors of Meagher Gummow and Lehanes Equity: Doctrines and Remedies state:

    What Not To Do During A Visitation Session With Your Child

    Minute ago! Sad news confirms about Chelsy Davy, Son Leo – Harry’s unrecognized son today

    many parents tend to want to discuss the CPS case with their child and the future of their relationship. I can appreciate how it feels like your child is one of the few people who understand what is going on in your life and your family. They are at the center of your family and the center of this CPS investigation. However, although you may view your child as a confidant if no other people are available to fill that role in your life, it is still not appropriate to discuss or speculate about the case with them, especially in a supervised Visitation setting. You are better off using the time to reconnect with your child about other things happening in their life, like school or other activities that they can participate in.

    Part of this discussion centers around not trying to speculate with your child as to when they will be able to come home. As I mentioned earlier in today’s blog post, many CPS cases depend on factors beyond your immediate control. As a result, even if the case proceeds as smoothly as possible from the perspective of your Visitation sessions with your child, that does not guarantee you any particular result when it comes to your child being able to come home at a certain date or time. Ultimately it is up to a judge whether or not to allow your child home and to restore your parental rights in full.

    Read Also: Can I Get A Replacement Safelink Phone

    Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress

    A victim can suffer emotional distress as the direct result of another person’s negligent behavior. When this happens, the victim may pursue compensation through a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim. This is a type of legal claim through which a victim may pursue financial compensation for emotional damage even if she did not suffer a physical injury.

    The rules for NIEDs vary from state to state. In some states, if the defendant’s negligent actions caused the plaintiff to suffer an impact, the plaintiff might have an NIED claim. In other states, the plaintiff being close enough to the defendant’s actions to potentially suffer harm is enough to render a claim valid. In most states, the defendant must have been able to reasonably predict that his actions could harm another person in order for an emotional distress claim to lead to compensation for the victim. In every state, the defendant must be shown to have acted negligently, that is, without exercising the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in that situation.

    More articles

    Popular Articles